Video: Kinky & Malkin!
Michelle Malkin appeared on Fox News Live along with Kinky Friedman and Tony Trupiano to discuss Natalee Holloway's disappearance in Aruba, Karl Rove and Oprah Winfrey. This is the segment covering Karl Rove.
You can watch the video HERE.
You can visit Michelle's site HERE.
Note: I couldn't resist the title- How often do you get the chance to have that headline?
Update II: Check out Pamela's latest post "The Fox Declawed is UNWATCHABLE; Long Live the Blogosphere"
Update: God bless the Moonbats! According to them, I am working with Karl Rove now in a sinister plan to "distract" them... What can I say? You moonbats caught me. Truth is, me and Karl played on the same little league baseball team, which was where we hatched this scheme at the age of 7. Good, thoughtful and intelligent comment, MOONBAT!
Note II: Link on Pamela's post was changed.
Nice try wingnuts, but you and Rove can't distract us from the quaqmire in Iraq, our destroyed economy and the soon-to-be impeached liar-in-chief:
http://mattstover.blogspot.com/2005/06/reprinted-without-commentary-from.html
Those who are not blinded by Jeebus chickenhaws and the far right message machine should read avove.
Posted by: Cain | June 24, 2005 at 03:21 PM
Your tinfoil hat needs some adjusting.
Posted by: Doug F | June 24, 2005 at 03:45 PM
Thanks a million Cain. I came this close to winning in moonbat comment bingo. Had you just thown in either "Chimp" or "Neocon" I would have won. Dammit, I wanted that velvet painting of Kos too.
Posted by: Zaphod | June 24, 2005 at 03:46 PM
Cain,
Of course we can distract you. All it takes is to flip on the DVD version of "The Wall" after you've inhaled your perennial de jour.
By the way, I’m glad to see that Hooked on Phonics really worked for you.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee | June 24, 2005 at 03:53 PM
Dear Cain: "Destroyed Economy"??? By what standard is our economy "destroyed", moonbat? The lowest unemployment rates in decades (lower than during the Clinton years), better or equal growth rates than we saw during the Clinton years, investment, real estate, all booming.
Hmmm...I guess all this good news WOULD constitute destruction. To liberals and their cause, anyway.
Posted by: Skifreak | June 24, 2005 at 03:53 PM
Trey, great blog! Keep it up.
Posted by: max | June 24, 2005 at 03:54 PM
Cain,
I think you are a little behind on your current events. The liar-in-chief (a.k.a. President Clinton) has already BEEN impeached.
Posted by: chuck | June 24, 2005 at 04:05 PM
Cain has been posting the same comment all over the place (ie. Vodkapundit). It's a vertible mark of Cain now.
Posted by: Major John | June 24, 2005 at 04:05 PM
This "Cain" is some lefty spambot. The exact same post, spelling errors and all, is on Vodkapundit.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley | June 24, 2005 at 04:07 PM
Dang it, Major, you type quicker than I do!
Posted by: Mr. Bingley | June 24, 2005 at 04:09 PM
Skifreak:
The only job growth has been on K street.
There are over 2 million less jobs now than when W took office. Yet the unemployment number is lower? How could that be?
Here's a hint: The unemployment rate doesn't include people who went back to school, it doesn't include people who found a part-time job, and it doesn't include people who have just plain given up.
If the economy is doing so well, how come wall street hasn't figured it out?
Posted by: DR | June 24, 2005 at 04:42 PM
There are over 2 million less jobs now than when W took office.
Wrong.
Last month [May 2005], jobs in the private sector finally reached the level of March 2001, when the last recession began.
http://www.jobwatch.org/
Posted by: R C Dean | June 24, 2005 at 05:09 PM
There are over 2 million less jobs now than when W took office.
Wrong.
Last month [May 2005], jobs in the private sector finally reached the level of March 2001, when the last recession began.
http://www.jobwatch.org/
Posted by: R C Dean | June 24, 2005 at 05:11 PM
And unemployment is down to 5.1%
Posted by: D L O | June 24, 2005 at 05:13 PM
I enjoyed the letter from John Kerry which attempted a weak response to Mr. Rove's commentary, which was directed at the Susan Sontag, Noam Chomsky liberal-left.
Why does the left defend itself, over and above defending our nation against the baseless slander of moonbat in arms Durbin?
Great resource Trey, keep it up.
Posted by: vladimir makovitsa | June 24, 2005 at 05:58 PM
Hey, chomsky (cain). The latest Dept of Labor statistics show a workforce that is some 10% larger than 10 years ago (149M vs 136M) with lower unemployment (5.1% vs 5.2%). In other words, there are many millions of more people working now than then. Maybe *you* have no salable skills and that's why you're still living in your Mom's basement?
Posted by: JorgXMcKie | June 24, 2005 at 07:07 PM
Thanks everybody!
btw- I love the "Chomsky" reference!
Trey
Posted by: Trey | June 24, 2005 at 07:11 PM
I have to say, Malkin was outstanding compared to that, whoever that was.....
Posted by: Paul of York | June 24, 2005 at 07:45 PM
BAAWAAAHAAAHAA!!
As much as you don't want to, you have to go to "Cain's" spambot address.
1) He looks like the president of the Freddie Mercury Fan Club (not that there is anything wrong with that).
2) He is, wait for it, an author .... of .... wait for it .... Star Wars inspired novels.
Priceless.
Posted by: CDR Salamander | June 24, 2005 at 08:27 PM
For all you leftist liberals, "Pacifism in the face of tyranny is treason” - Saint Thomas Aquinas
Posted by: Jack Marino | June 24, 2005 at 08:34 PM
For all you leftist liberals, "Pacifism in the face of tyranny is treason” - Saint Thomas Aquinas
Posted by: Jack Marino | June 24, 2005 at 08:35 PM
Picking on Cain.
You all have been suckered by Karl again. He will say anything to get your blood running.
Posted by: John Rieman | June 24, 2005 at 09:02 PM
I've got your Thomas Aquinas right here:
"That the saints may enjoy their beatitude and the grace of God more abundantly they are permitted to see the punishment of the damned in hell." -- Saint Thomas Aquinas
Nice.
BTW, would "tyrrany" include claiming and using the power to strip any American citizen of every right by simply decreeing him to be an "enemy combatant"? With no oversight or review short of impeachment? Heck, he could just secretly declare anyone trying to impeach him an enemy combatant and disappear them.
Posted by: Randal Trimmer | June 25, 2005 at 09:07 AM
Well, yeah, that would be pretty tyrannical, had it ever actually happened. You used a rhetorical trick that those of us who actually know about such things call a 'straw man'. No cookie for you.
Posted by: David Gillies | June 25, 2005 at 09:37 AM
DR,
You left out one other group not counted, those who became self-employed. Convenient.
And how are people who can afford to return to school a sign of a bad economy? Heck, I'd love to go back for a masters in English Lit and live the life of a full time student, but I'm spending fifty hours a week on a job that actually contributes to the economy and to my family.
Posted by: just Ken | June 25, 2005 at 09:45 AM